Wednesday November 24, 2010

Bringing the Gillette model back to help Indian music business

Posted by Karthik

If you do not know about an Indian music magazine called ‘SoundBox’, I don’t blame you. It costs Rs. 150 and is available very, very selectively as far as I know. I – thankfully – get it, due to this blog of mine! And I love it!

The latest issue has a cover story on the state of Indian music industry. This is a pet topic for me and I have a few points to make. But, before I do, here’s the PDF of the 8 pages that constitute this cover story (8 page excerpt reproduced with permission from SoundBox – click on the cover page to download the PDF file, 300 KB).

Now, for my perspective.

Yes, revenue-wise, the industry may indeed be bleeding, but they have only them to blame for this mess. Hanging on to the ‘mp3′ and ‘piracy’ issues will not help them or anyone, any longer. It sounded like a great excuse some time back – not anymore.

I read news reports about some regional music industry coming together to fight ‘piracy’ – the latest was the Kannada music industry. Some of the tactics they have used so far include creating mp3 CDs for sale and adding many more songs in the same CD to add value, pricing CDs really cheap (sometimes even free) and so on.

These are definitely good tactics, but the first realization should be about why pirates exist. Pirates may exist because of two reasons – one, where the price of the product is higher than what the market is ready to pay and two, to fill gaps in access/availability.

CDs used to be priced higher at least some time back, so tapes/cassettes ruled the roost at a cheaper price point. After digital music entered the fray, cassettes are almost non-existent now, while even cheaper CDs are finding it difficult to sell. So, with regard to the price factor, the first point is that cheaper prices have not stopped piracy, because there is always a place where even that cheaper bit of music is available for free. Between free and cheap, I’m sure you know what people are likely to choose. So, how do you compete with free?

For that, we need to take up the 2nd point why pirates exist – access/availability gaps.

It has been many years since iTunes revolutionized the music industry all over the globe and we Indians have still not learnt anything out of an incredibly visible successful business model. iTunes works because it makes music available before physical sources do and makes the process of buying a breeze.

I have personal issues with Apple hogging the whole process and it not being open enough, but those don’t take anything away from the sheer brilliance in the way it is executed. Music labels fell in line for iTunes because it allows them to sell even singles so easily and not force entire albums down listeners’ throats. It also helped that the internet penetration in the US and Europe is phenomenally better compared to India, where the state is still largely pathetic. Given that, it is not possible to replicate the same thing in India until internet access improves and becomes far more prevalent. That is still some years away given the glaring economic disparities – no, 3G and phone-led internet access is not part of the solution either. So, what is the solution?

This may sound corny, but the solution is simply to bring the Gillette model back, in my opinion. Gillette’s (or any safety razor’s) business model is in owning both the razor and blade within one company. The razor is relatively expensive while blades are comparatively cheaper (let us not get into the prices of Gillette’s expensive blades, please!) – the point is to create loyal users by offering a predictable base to use the blade and get people to continue paying for the blades. This worked perfectly fine with cassettes-cassette player, CD-CD player…but when digital music happened, this predictable and consistent model of one vehicle-one player went for a toss.

Now that we have outgrown the cassette and CD waves, digital music, removed of internet, is incredibly more portable than ever. A thumb sized flash drive today can contain even 8GB worth of music and can have utility value more than that music itself, as a storage device. Much like a standard cassette, if you wish to compare!

So, the first point is to get the razor-part right. What we need is to rebuild the eco-system, with relatively cheap flash-based music players with varying levels of quality and complexity. This is no doubt reinventing the wheel – where once brands sold the cassette player, they moved on to the CD player. Now, there are cheap Chinese players that play both CDs and flash drives, but these are still multi-utility players and hence expensive. Why not a standalone flash-only player? I have seen cheap ones from Croma, which also have a screen for selecting songs or viewing videos – it was priced at about Rs. 6,500 the last time I saw it. Good enough, but we perhaps need cheaper players at the Rs. 500-1,000 price point which just require even a rural user to insert a flash player and play the music.

Do not start discussing sound quality here – if quality of sound is a concern, I’m sure the person is in a different price segment and won’t be concerned about downloading pirated material either.

That addresses, hopefully, the music player part. Next, the music part.

Access of music is still a huge concern. There is a reason why pirates tag their material with ‘First On Net’! The last time SaReGaMa tried making available a film title online immediately after its launch was ‘Jhootha Hi Sahi’. The site couldn’t take the load and was stuck as soon as the songs went live. They perhaps underestimated the number of people how may be trying to buy online.

The point is to make music purchase not as a classy activity as it once was (those days are over), but into a commoditized one. If a film’s music is scheduled for 3 days from now, make it available in those flash drives, either as singles or as albums on that day, via many modes of distribution including super markets and kirana stores. Imagine – these are the guys who get our bread and milk every single day, on time and depend on an impressive distribution system for the same. Milk and bread still need to be distributed physically, across cities/states, but digital music need not be. It can be transferred via the internet and the store-level processes can take care of making musical packages using flash drives. So, only the content travels, that too digitally, to the end-retailers, not the entire damn music vehicle. The idea is to make music available ubiquitously and make it an impulse purchase at even billing counters…the way they have chocolates there, which we pay Rs. 10 without even thinking about it. Why such a suggestion? Because it is easier to enable consistent internet access to a few million kirana/departmental/assorted stores than a billion+ citizens.

I hear you worrying about music being a piece of art and selling it via kirana stores like this diluting its art value – I agree. But then, art-level music will have its own followers who may be willing to pay a price for it – that need not apply for something as massy as film music or Indipop.

So, even though it may sound like a tall order at least now, I believe there are some signs of this happening at various levels. T-series is trying flash drives as a music vehicle, along with CDs, but given the lack of mass-level flash-based music only players, it is still a non-starter. Computers and laptops are one option, but the magical device will need to be cheap enough and portable enough to play just flash drives and little else (maybe radio too?). What is stopping a Videocon or T-series (or even a Sony) from inventing such vanilla devices that could be sold in large numbers at throwaway prices?

This could also be a clue to someone like a Nokia (or the many Indian cellphone hardware brands) that could add a flash-drive USB player right in the phone – battery life be damned! But, that’s one of the issues I have with buying music via phones – it is a great distribution mechanism, no doubt…it is also an existing eco-system unlike the one I’m proposing which needs to be built from scratch…but, traditionally, Indians are not the kind who are personal music listeners. We like our music away from those ear phones/head phones that people outside the country use as a matter of right! So…can we pander to that and not try to convert our folks into private music listeners? Most importantly, when music is commoditized at the distribution level, these music carrying vehicles (flash drives) can be used in expensive players (stand-alone music players with USB drives), car players, computers, laptops and also these vanilla devices that millions of Indians can afford.

As far making legitimate music available far more easily than it is now, easier said than done, I understand, but the debate needs to go beyond the format (cassette to CD to digital) and into the point-of-sale/distribution. The format challenge has somewhat been scaled, but the point-of-sale/distribution demands unique solutions for India, far removed from a model that depends solely on ubiquitous internet access.

Do notice that I’m not saying anything about the quality of music when it comes to sales/revenues :-) Assorted qualities of music has been in existence even before digital piracy started and will continue – the market will automatically find a way to push good/acceptable quality over poor quality ones!

  • jdoe7890

    For me the main reasons why music is pirated (atleast outside India) is the accessibility and price. The CD’s are always available in stores a couple of weeks late and most people are not ready to pay $6.99 for a CD anymore. Eros Entertainment tried to offer cheaper downloads ( for the films they won) but the audio quality and online experience ( zero customer service) was just not up to the mark.

  • jdoe7890

    I paid $8.99 for Pancham’s CD’s and then i see people downloading the same albums ( in CD quality) for free … How do you beat that?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_D2Z76CXKY3WTPYHUDYC6UOX5YQ Ramki,the Orc

    The analogy of Gillete may not fit in here . Devices are completly different market and is already saturated with chinese, burmese players . As a consumer for me to buy this along with iPODS , Creative and loads of other audio players is a big kill . But it ‘may’ help people who don’t have this . And you have assumed that people using iPODs are in a different price segment and won’t be bothered about pirated material . Now , for most people who download in internet, i assume they are well – off , but still they don’t buy CDs- because it is a recurring expense and the fact that sometimes these players would have been gifted or bought by a Tom/Dick/Harry from US for 100$ and sent.

    The other idea of making music sell like chocolates in departmental stores by downloading to flash drives may work well. If it is dirt cheap , and people can download songs for 3 rs or so at mass level can work .

    Now the conversation,

    At checkout counter ,

    “மேடம், உங்க பில் 397 , பாக்கி , முணு ரூபாய்க்கு, ஒரு ஏ.ஆர். ரஹ்மான் ஒட மர்மயோகி டைட்டில் சாங்க் தரவா ?”

    • milliblog

      Love that Marmayogi touch – you’re quite hopeful :-)

  • http://twitter.com/harsha_chitturi Sri Harsha Chitturi

    Personally, the flash drive distribution sounds like a rollback for the online population. The ease of access which digital music offers cannot be beated by flash drives or CDs. You can make the content on flash drives DRM free so that I can copy it to my system, but why would I bother to go to a store when I could download it online and that too without quality hassles. And this ease of access is precisely the reason for success of Itunes or Napster or any digital music store. Another solution is making music freely available for listeners online and capitalizing on the website and other content. Or they can charge a nominal monthly fee for the users. Websites like Vevo and Raaga are running successfully on this model. Regarding distribution among non-online population, the format change may not go well with a major section of lower middle class and poor who are currently buying music, since they may not be interested in buying a new player for listening music. Instead they may get pirated music in their required medium like CD/Cassette.
    Moreover, except for the format change, I don’t see much difference between flash drive model and CD model. The CD Player-CD model also had the advantages which you were mentioning until it was ruined by the IPods and mp3 players. The loyal user concept works when there is no other accessible medium for listeners. That’s the reason Cassettes and CDs worked when there the reach of Internet is less and costly.

  • http://twitter.com/catchgops gopalsrinivasan

    Why would a music company want to make ‘razors’ which it cannot lock into its ‘blades’? Unlike, Gillette where you have to go back to Gillette to buy a blade that works with their razor, the gradual disappearance of DRM, means that users can buy and/or load any content they want since the device is, at its core, just memory. Also, why create another kind of device and then make it plug into phones? Most phones, even at the lower end of the market can play digital music and many of them come with SD (or some other format) slots for memory cards. Wouldn’t it be much simpler to such pre-load music on SD cards? In fact, IMI is already doing this – tying up with mobile retail outlets to legally sell pre-loaded memory cards with music. However, even with massive scale, these cards cost Rs. 100 or higher for 512 Mbps of memory. So, we go back to the question of what cost is a listener willing to pay for music today.

    • milliblog

      On music companies making ‘razors’, I stand corrected if it sounded confusing – in Gillette’s case they own both the razor and the blade and users are locked-in. That’s not the same thing I was referring to – I hate DRM anyway – the point was to replicate the cassette-player, CD-player model again, but with memory drives. The idea was to proliferate players for these devices as standalone players away from the way they demand many devices that do a lot more than just playing them. In a way, it is music player, for music’s sake, not for, say a phone or computer’s sake.

      I have written about my annoyance with music on phone – I still believe it is a small’ish segment that enjoys music on a device like phone, though access-wise, it is perhaps the most established eco-system yet!

      When you allow traditional retailers of everything else other than music to also carry music (we have seen this happening already – Nilgiris has/had a rudimentary CD stand near the billing counter), the industry was merely trying to expand its retail presence without changing anything. Where the difference could be made is in stopping physical production of CDs/cassettes (reducing capital expenditure and overheads on distribution) and pass only the content to PoS outlets – much like how digital films are transferred to theaters.

      • http://twitter.com/catchgops gopalsrinivasan

        Like it or not, mobile phones are the all-in-one devices for the masses. And for many of them that is the way to listen and carry their digital music with them. Peek into any retail store when it’s not busy in the kitchen of a restaurant or behind the desk at a courier centre. Music players that play USB, flash memory are expensive. Computers are less than 10% of mobile phone installed base in the country. None of them are portable.

        Companies (Airtel) have tried setting up kiosks where you could plug your mobile phone and copy digital music. Or even to a memory stick. Either it never really took off or Airtel lost patience very soon.

  • adi0704

    When i want to buy a cd i want to make sure what i get is good. But recently considering hindi music has lost its soul and has started dishing out nonsense. i personally don’t feel compelled to buy as i did before. Mainly because i think most of the composers, i feel, are only treating song making a business rather than their passion. dont u think so too?

  • balajij

    First let us first look at Indian music, an average album in Tamil has 5 songs ..let me believe …..An average music listener can be predictive bout the 5 songs . 1.Hero opening song ,followed by a peppy number , an item song, a romantic song …Oops I did forgot to mention a earthly sad touching song …..This is just a predictive assumption and need not be true….

    You have A grade Music composers followed by B grade who don’t care about anything new and interesting , rather they churn out albums at rocket speed!!
    It is reward rather than the award they are(producer) more focused about…

    Indian music is more like promoting the film rather than the album itself .. Thanks to SUN TV ….
    Look at the audio release of (Kadalil Vilundhen–Nakka Mukka)
    (Dindukal Sarathi- Theme song)

    One thing is very clear …. here the production houses or the music labels do not do justice to the Singers ,lyricist who are the back bone to any album.
    without which the music industry in INDIA cannot cannot grow like the western music….

  • http://twitter.com/chilli270 Sridhar Raman

    I agree with Gopal. Travel in any city bus and more than half the people are listening to music/radio on their phones. So, that is the way forward (or present) for the masses.

    Regarding piracy as such, sorry to be cynical, but, I don’t see it dying unless the changes come from the people (and not necessarily or alone from the music labels). Music is different from books or movies (2 other highly pirated content medium). As much as people can download movies through torrents, the actual movie experience in a hall cannot be replicated. Similarly, lesser said about the print quality of pirated books.

    But music is different (unique?). Pirated users and original users listen to almost the same quality. Hence, whatever goodies the music companies offer, it will work only when people realise that piracy is stealing (without any sugar-coating). Until then, free is going to beat 0.0001 rupees all the time.